Charles "THe DARwin" Darwin
Organism Development Theory
Did Man Come from the Heavens? I say No.
Get yourself a cup of coffee, a comfy chair, some painkillers and a trash can. Because I’m about to lay the truth on you so hard it’s going to blow your mind, and trust me. It’s going to hurt. So many people have been throwing around their own ideas as to why we exists. I mean with being as sexy, clever and cruel and humans, it’s hard to imagine that their perfect creature could arise without the help of from the big man upstairs. But after a long of pondering and research, and observing the animals around us it finally hit me. What if instead of finished products we are merely just variations on a single prototype, and what if this prototype had no finished product in mind. What if instead of their being a guiding force behind nature, nature itself provides this force. In the force that nature provides is a natural "selector" for which updates make it to the next version, a sort of evolution of species themselves.
Did Man Come from the Heavens? I say No.
Get yourself a cup of coffee, a comfy chair, some painkillers and a trash can. Because I’m about to lay the truth on you so hard it’s going to blow your mind, and trust me. It’s going to hurt. So many people have been throwing around their own ideas as to why we exists. I mean with being as sexy, clever and cruel and humans, it’s hard to imagine that their perfect creature could arise without the help of from the big man upstairs. But after a long of pondering and research, and observing the animals around us it finally hit me. What if instead of finished products we are merely just variations on a single prototype, and what if this prototype had no finished product in mind. What if instead of their being a guiding force behind nature, nature itself provides this force. In the force that nature provides is a natural "selector" for which updates make it to the next version, a sort of evolution of species themselves.
Thomas Huxley
You got a pretty decent idea right their, not bad but it your making a pretty big claim here man. Humans coming from ants? That’s a pretty hard thing to swallow given that Haha. But seriously this sounds pretty legit, but I don’t know if the whole gradual thing is correct man. It seems like a more solid theory than that transmutation stuff Lamarck is throwing around.
Also I don't mean to piggyback off your site but check out my review of Robert Chambers "Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation", this is seriously the only review I ever have qualms of conscience about, on the ground of needless savagery. I mean some people say dumb stuff but I tore this guy a new one after he rattled on about his crazy ideas similar to yours, but not as contrived.
Also I don't mean to piggyback off your site but check out my review of Robert Chambers "Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation", this is seriously the only review I ever have qualms of conscience about, on the ground of needless savagery. I mean some people say dumb stuff but I tore this guy a new one after he rattled on about his crazy ideas similar to yours, but not as contrived.
Charles "THe Darwin" Darwin
Tom, I understand this is a lot to take in all at once, I mean with the world economy tanking and terrorists wanting to wreck us at every opportunity, it seems like the last thing we need is one more earth shattering revelation to make us lose what little sleep we have left. But work with me for a minute here, this is not like the other audacious ideas floating around.
Consider that if every species is able to get in on as much as possible, that there is only so much chow to go around. We did follow that only so many of these little tykes produced would make it into adulthood, and couldn't we say that those that do make it do so because they are somehow fitter than the rest?
Therefore those that do go now to get it on again in the next generation must carry with them whatever traits and features their parents had.
Consider that if every species is able to get in on as much as possible, that there is only so much chow to go around. We did follow that only so many of these little tykes produced would make it into adulthood, and couldn't we say that those that do make it do so because they are somehow fitter than the rest?
Therefore those that do go now to get it on again in the next generation must carry with them whatever traits and features their parents had.
THOMAS HUXLEY
Still not getting it completely.
CHARLES "THE DARWIN" DARWIN
An example would be that if somewhere in family line there is genetic mistake that is actually beneficial, however small, it will carry over his children, assuming that is able to court a chick or at least persuade her that his dad “really is the CEO” long enough for his horizontal shuffle to bear its fruit. I mean let’s say some ant gets a mutation that is equivalent to someone getting better seats at a concert. While this may seem like nothing let’s suppose some drunken Ivy stage dives and lands in his arms, and they end up tying the knot then and popping out a few kids, if those kids share his affinity for early ticket buying and college girls continue to do stupid stuff whilst hammered, then we could say this is an evolutionary adaptation. Sure it comes a lot down to luck, but it’s the same with nature, relatively speaking, and if this early ticket buying trait was so prolific that we gained a new sect of ticket buying hipsters who has women falling on them left and right to the point that they be product a species of man children that are defined by this trait, then we have a new species through a series of these gradual steps.